This is the worst printer we have ever had in our test centers, apart from the cheap price tag (it costs $80) we didn’t like anything about this device. We had lots of hardware malfunctions while testing the printer, the print speed was very slow and we don’t know what the manufacturer was thinking when it brought this awful printer to the market. The print quality too is extremely bad. We would recommend you against buying this printer and go for Canon Pixma MX330 which is belongs to the same price range and is a better performer by miles. If you are adept at printers, you will quickly notice that this device is much behind in quality level when compared to printers in these days are offering. If you are adept at printers, you will quickly notice that Brother DCP 165C is behind as compared to what other printers in the market today are offering.  [...]

I guess the makers of this multifunction printer are still stuck somewhere in the 1990’s. frankly, its high time that they zap out of this phase and get a reality check because using this computer just made me feel like I was traveling in a time machine which goes only into the past… anyways going towards the review. Razzle-dazzle: Possibly progressive thinking is something that the makers of this printer have not really heard of because it really leaves you unsatisfied when it comes to innovative invention. It’s a small printer standing at 16.1 inches wide by 19.3 inches deep and 12.8 inches tall, but whoever said that only the size is the best part of the design. Its highly out of vogue black look does very little to add to its looks or to get me even talking  [...]